PhotoLab lacks compatibility with SpyderCheckr, where a custom profile is created from a shot of a test chart in the scene, which can be very useful for studio work where color accuracy is important. But with silkypix it does appear that the 16bit TIFF has most if not all the RAW pixel data even in highlights. If it was true 16bit it should have the same DR as the RAW files but a lot of them truncate the highlights in particular. One thing I noticed with some of these programs is that their TIFF files don't actually seem to be 16bits. The saving grace is that you can export a pretty high quality 16bit TIFF for further manipulation in say Photoshop. Only thing I noticed good about Silkypix was the basic image out of the box looks great, you just can't adjust it very much because the adjustment tools tend to make everything worse. woops again! Both functions leave artifacts around edges. ![]() Like the new Fine Detail noise reduction, terrible! And finally, the shadows/highlights recovery. For two, half the functions just make the image worse. My problem with silkypix: For one, it is even slower than DxO which is an accomplishment of sorts. I thinks it's good to be familiar with multiple raw developer/editor programs to leverage the strengths of each when needed. I have been watching some very helpful SilkyPix tutorials on YouTube, and I am starting to get more proficient with the program. It has a lot to offer, but the manual and overall design of the program are a bit of a challenge. The marketing approach for Capture One 21 renewed my interest in both SilkyPix and darktable, and I have started using SilkyPix as a primary raw developer/editor. In the past, catalog-type software annoyed me too - it felt like it was trying to force me into a particular workflow. When you get used to the slightly unusual interface, it is quite powerful. The RAW rendering is probably as good as anything else out there - as Sourov says, SilkyPix is under the hood for a lot of manufacturers' own RAW developers. ![]() I subsequently used SilkyPix DS Pro for Panasonic, Sony and Nikon RAWs. A Panasonic-only version came with the LX100 and later when I was looking around for something to deal with multiple RAWs, as Sourov says "THE SOLUTION WAS RIGHT IN FRONT OF ME ALL THE TIME!". Most of the controls are pretty much the same as any other RAW developer. I don't find it particularly horrible, it's got the most sensible tone curve tool I've found so far. I find Silkypix useful enough that I paid for the pro version.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |